I have been doing some reading for a project comparing various RDBMS and I
have read that SQL Server is not very stable for DBs over 300GB but I have
also read about terrabyte-plus databases running just fine. Are there any
recommendations or articles from Microsoft about the capacity of SQL Server
(2000 or 2005)?
Hi
Probably you can check this:
http://chanduas.blogspot.com/2005/05...fications.html
please let me know if you have any questions
best Regards,
Chandra
http://chanduas.blogspot.com/
http://groups.msn.com/SQLResource/
"Robert Kinesta" wrote:
> I have been doing some reading for a project comparing various RDBMS and I
> have read that SQL Server is not very stable for DBs over 300GB but I have
> also read about terrabyte-plus databases running just fine. Are there any
> recommendations or articles from Microsoft about the capacity of SQL Server
> (2000 or 2005)?
|||> I have read that SQL Server is not very stable for DBs over 300GB
Sounds like either advocacy or marketing misinformation. I have worked
on and know of many SQL Server databases that are much larger. Equally,
bad design or improper hardware can defeat a database of any size.
Take a look at:
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techinf...alability.mspx
David Portas
SQL Server MVP
Showing posts with label ihave. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ihave. Show all posts
Saturday, February 25, 2012
Articles on SQL Server capacity
I have been doing some reading for a project comparing various RDBMS and I
have read that SQL Server is not very stable for DBs over 300GB but I have
also read about terrabyte-plus databases running just fine. Are there any
recommendations or articles from Microsoft about the capacity of SQL Server
(2000 or 2005)?Hi
Probably you can check this:
http://chanduas.blogspot.com/2005/0...ifications.html
please let me know if you have any questions
best Regards,
Chandra
http://chanduas.blogspot.com/
http://groups.msn.com/SQLResource/
---
"Robert Kinesta" wrote:
> I have been doing some reading for a project comparing various RDBMS and I
> have read that SQL Server is not very stable for DBs over 300GB but I have
> also read about terrabyte-plus databases running just fine. Are there any
> recommendations or articles from Microsoft about the capacity of SQL Serve
r
> (2000 or 2005)?|||> I have read that SQL Server is not very stable for DBs over 300GB
Sounds like either advocacy or marketing misinformation. I have worked
on and know of many SQL Server databases that are much larger. Equally,
bad design or improper hardware can defeat a database of any size.
Take a look at:
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techin...calability.mspx
David Portas
SQL Server MVP
--
have read that SQL Server is not very stable for DBs over 300GB but I have
also read about terrabyte-plus databases running just fine. Are there any
recommendations or articles from Microsoft about the capacity of SQL Server
(2000 or 2005)?Hi
Probably you can check this:
http://chanduas.blogspot.com/2005/0...ifications.html
please let me know if you have any questions
best Regards,
Chandra
http://chanduas.blogspot.com/
http://groups.msn.com/SQLResource/
---
"Robert Kinesta" wrote:
> I have been doing some reading for a project comparing various RDBMS and I
> have read that SQL Server is not very stable for DBs over 300GB but I have
> also read about terrabyte-plus databases running just fine. Are there any
> recommendations or articles from Microsoft about the capacity of SQL Serve
r
> (2000 or 2005)?|||> I have read that SQL Server is not very stable for DBs over 300GB
Sounds like either advocacy or marketing misinformation. I have worked
on and know of many SQL Server databases that are much larger. Equally,
bad design or improper hardware can defeat a database of any size.
Take a look at:
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techin...calability.mspx
David Portas
SQL Server MVP
--
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)